Pensions Matter: case law round-up
Harvey (PO 1394) Bulk Transfer delay causes financial loss to a member
The Deputy Pensions Ombudsman (DPO) partly upheld a complaint from a member that he suffered financial loss due to his pension fund being transferred outside of a 10-day transfer window, which had been agreed under a bulk transfer. The member was also unhappy that the funds were sent via cheque rather than electronically and complained accordingly.
As mentioned, the DPO partly upheld the complaint; however the DPO held that the respondent’s offer of paying the member’s loss, on the basis that his funds were transferred and invested with the incoming pension provider seven days after his transfer request, was reasonable under the circumstances.
The DPO also held that given the funds were calculated to have been invested the day after the deemed investment date (seven days from the date the claim form was issued) the member had not suffered any additional detriment than if the funds had been transferred electronically…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
Why register to The Lawyer
More relevant to you
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
In March, MPs backed legislation for the plain packaging of cigarettes. Health campaigners have welcomed the news; tobacco companies have not.
Contrasting decisions involving applications for registrations of the respective marks GREEN SMOKE and GREENWORLD are instructive in highlighting registry approaches to the concept of distinctiveness.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.