Pensions liberation: the latest instalment
In Pi Consulting (Trustee Services) Ltd v The Pensions Regulator (and Others), the High Court ruled that the suspected pension liberation schemes were ‘occupational pension schemes’ within the statutory definition.
It means they fall under the jurisdiction of the Pensions Regulator and, as such, the Pensions Regulator had power to appoint independent trustees to the schemes.
An ancillary effect of the court’s conclusion is that member transfers to the schemes in question are unlikely to constitute unauthorised payments, so members and transferring schemes would not be liable for tax charges in consequence of transferring to the schemes…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
A developer can commit the offence of ‘knowingly permitting’ the deposit of waste by its contractor, despite having no knowledge that the deposit was in breach of an environmental permit.
The case of Hershaw and ors v Sheffield City Council is a reminder to employers to be careful about how and what they communicate to their employees.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…