Penalty clauses in commercial agreements: El Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings
By Rebecca Gardner and Zachary Brown
It is common for parties to commercial agreements to agree mechanisms for resolving breaches of their agreement without having to resort to legal proceedings. Typically this is done by incorporating provisions, such as forfeiture or compulsory buy-back clauses, into a contract, which are activated upon one party’s breach of its terms.
In such a situation, it is important for the parties to ensure that such provisions could not be characterised as penalties so as to render them unenforceable. This issue was considered in the case of El Makdessi v Cavendish Square Holdings BV and another *2013+ EWCA Civ 1539, where the Court of Appeal was asked to review an earlier decision by the High Court on the question of whether clauses in a share purchase agreement (SPA), which were activated in response to the seller’s breach of restrictive covenant, constituted unenforceable penalties.
It is a long-established rule of law that a clause that is deemed to be a penalty will be unenforceable. In determining whether a clause is a penalty, the courts often use liquidated damages clauses (which are enforceable) as a point of comparison…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Goodman Derrick briefing.
News from Goodman Derrick
Briefings from Goodman Derrick
Following a six-year project by the Law Commission, the Inheritance and Trustees’ Powers Act 2014 came into force on 1 October.
A recent decision in the Birmingham County Court has changed the way in which it was understood the legislation relating to tenancies and deposits was meant to operate.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Active financial management is vital, but with firms looking more closely at the process of debt and fee collection, the personal touch still counts
The lure of the law can kick in at any stage of life. We speak to four individuals who have made a radical switch to a legal career