Penalty clauses and liquidated damages: traps for the unwary
Liquidated damages (LDs) clauses stipulate that a certain specified sum of money will be payable by one (‘guilty’) party to the other (‘innocent’) party, where there has been a particular breach of contract.
LDs are a useful contracting tool in commercial agreements, but there is a danger that, if they are not considered properly or drafted correctly, they may be construed as a ‘penalty clause’, and therefore unenforceable under English law. The recent judgment in E-Nik Ltd v Department for Communities and Local Government has reignited the debate about ‘take or pay’ clauses by confirming that such provisions could also fall foul of the rule against penalties.
LDs are often payable where there is a delay in delivery or completion of a particular service, or where a service fails to meet certain specified targets. LDs bring a greater degree of certainty than relying on the contract law rules regarding claiming general damages - you know how much you can recover (or how much you will pay) if a certain type of breach occurs…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
The Supreme Court has held that a claimant’s right to recover a conditional fee agreement success fee and after the event insurance from an unsuccessful defendant is not contrary to the ECHR.
The existing Living Wage is already higher than the National Living Wage. What’s going on?
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…