‘Pay for delay’: privity and Lundbeck
Pharmaceuticals company Lundbeck has been the subject of two important decisions in recent weeks — the first concerning the practice of pharmaceuticals companies seeking to prevent or delay the entry onto the market of generic competitors and the second relating to privity of interest in a patent dispute.
The European Commission has been investigating perceived anti-competitive practices in the pharmaceuticals sector. It launched an inquiry into the sector in January 2008, publishing its final report in July 2009. The final report found that the market was not functioning as it should and that these deficiencies could largely be attributed to delays in the entry of generic medicines to the market.
In particular, the European Commission concluded that originator drug companies were using a number of methods to extend the commercial life of their medicines and to prevent or delay the entry of generics. It has been monitoring patent settlement agreements, reflecting its concern that such agreements are being used as a means to delay the entry of generic products onto the market and thus to extend artificially the patent holder’s monopoly…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
When considered practically, the logical approach would be that a property is worth however much people are prepared to pay for it.
The degree and object of annexation were the key principles for the High Court to consider in the recent case of Lictor Anstalt v Mir Steel UK Ltd and Libala Ltd.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.