Pause for thought: postponement of hearing would have been a reasonable adjustment
Hibbett v The Home Office is another case on the duty to make reasonable adjustments for an employee with a disability, a duty which arises where the employer applies a ‘provision, criterion or practice’ which puts the employee at a substantial disadvantage.
The claimant was accused of misconduct — submitting an expenses claim for the cost of relaxation therapy which her manager had already declined to approve. (At that point, she had consulted her GP about anxiety and poor sleep but was not at that stage suffering from a disability as defined for the purposes of disability discrimination.) Prior to the disciplinary hearing she was signed off with anxiety and work-related depression. The hearing was postponed once but went ahead on the re-scheduled date, regardless of the fact that the claimant had been referred to occupational health but had not yet been seen.
The tribunal found that the subsequent dismissal was unfair but that the failure to delay the disciplinary hearing was not a breach of the duty to make reasonable adjustments because, on the evidence, the claimant had been able to cope with the proceedings; in other words, there had been no disadvantage to her arising from the fact that the hearing was not postponed…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump