Patents: the Italian Supreme Court on fair premium for employees’ inventions
On 9 April 2014, the Supreme Court issued a decision in a case brought by an employee against his employer where he sought the payment of a fair premium for an invention he created during his employment relationship.
Under Italian law, employees’ inventions are regulated under article 64 of Legislative Decree no. 30 of 2005. Said rule is primarily aimed at defining the ownership status of said inventions. The allocation of rights between the employer and the employee depends mainly on two circumstances: (i) if the inventive activity falls within employees’ tasks; and (ii) if the employee receives a compensation for such inventive activity…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the NCTM briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from NCTM
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from NCTM
In Italy, measures have been taken to preserve the continuity of operation of industrial plants of national strategic interest.
Can the admission to concordato preventivo be revoked if creditors, informed by the judicial commissioner of fraudulent acts, approved the proposal of the debtor?
The Italian Supreme Court ruled that the disclosure of acts in fraud carried out by the debtor causes the admission to concordato preventivo to be revoked according to Article 173 IBL, even in case of approval by the creditors.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Being sent to London on secondment is a prized opportunity for associates in European firms