Patents: the IP Court of Milan on patent claim reformulation
With the decision no. 7708/2014 dated 11 June 2014, the IP Court of Milan issued an important decision over patent claims reformulation during a validity proceeding.
Under article 79, paragraph 3, of Legislative Decree no. 30 of 2005 (hereinafter ‘CPI’), patent holders have the right to reformulate disputed claims in the course of validity proceedings ‘within the limits of the patent application as originally filed and not extending the scope of protection conferred by the patent as granted’.
In the case at stake, the IP Court of Milan was asked to declare the invalidity of three Italian patents and two Italian patent applications, owned by a competitor, and to ascertain that the product manufactured and sold by the plaintiff did not infringe the contested patents. The defendant filed a counterclaim of infringement for two of the mentioned patents, seeking damages and an injunction…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the NCTM briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from NCTM
Across the EUniverse, issue 1: e-books VAT battle; freedom of personal data; shareholders’ rights revisited; and more
Legal implications of the latest moves in Brussels.
Longer term benefits alone (such as increased R&D investment) should not be included in the balancing exercise.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Being sent to London on secondment is a prized opportunity for associates in European firms