Partners as workers — the Supreme Court ruling and automatic enrolment for LLPs
By Ian Curry
The Supreme Court decision in Clyde & Co v Bates van Winkelhof has focused attention on the employment status of partners who are members of limited liability partnerships (LLPs). This alert outlines the implications for pensions and automatic enrolment.
The Supreme Court decided that a fixed-salary partner who was a member of an LLP was a ‘worker’ for employment law purposes. As a result, many members of LLPs (who are usually referred to as partners) may be considered workers under the Pensions Act 2008 and are potentially subject to automatic enrolment.
Any LLPs who had relied on the previous decision in the Court of Appeal and excluded their members on the grounds that they weren’t workers will now have to reconsider this position…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
Wragges has prepared this glossary of terms to assist your understanding of some of the more common terminology used in insurance policies that you may come across in the construction industry.
A number of high-profile cases should remind those in customer-facing service industries that discrimination is an issue that should not be ignored.