Participation of government contractors in patent infringement actions against the US government
The recent decision by the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the case of In re Uusi LLC et al No 2013-155 may be of interest to companies that sell to the US government. Normally, claims of patent infringement relating to such sales must be brought against the government rather than the manufacturer, but the manufacturer is usually obliged to indemnify. In the Uusi case, the Federal Circuit addressed the ability of third parties to enter an appearance and file pleadings, at the government’s invitation, in an action against the government in the Court of Federal Claims. The Federal Circuit held that a third party with a sufficient interest in the subject matter of the lawsuit in the Court of Federal Claims can file a pleading that asserts defences to the claims, so long as the pleading does not result in claims between private parties.
The Uusi case involved claims by plaintiffs Uusi and OLDNAR Corporation (collectively ‘Uusi’) that third parties Grand Haven Stamped Products (GHSP) and AM General manufactured remote-control switch systems that infringed Uusi’s patents and were subsequently incorporated into articles accepted by the US government…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump