Parental leave and new rights for employees
The law of 19 June 2013 was published on 24 June 2013 in the Memorial. The law amends the Labour Code with new provisions about parental leave that are intended to enable employees to better balance work and family life. The law implements the Council Directive 2010/18/UE of 8 March 2010 applying the framework agreement as amended on parental leave. The directive sets the minimum duration of parental leave at four months and facilitates the return to work of employees at its end.
The amendments introduced by the law mainly concern (i) a new entitlement for employees to have a meeting with the employer at the end of the parental leave and (ii) an extension of the non-remunerated parental leave…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Allen & Overy briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
At the time of its launch Accutrainee was described as a revolutionary change to the training model. Has it proved to be so? Not really.