Parental guidance — leave must not be a negative factor in redundancy decisions
Riezniece v Zemkopibas ministrija arose out of a redundancy selection exercise in the Latvian civil service. In 2009 the department had decided to abolish one of its adviser posts, based on performance appraisal criteria from that year. The claimant was not at work in 2009, so she was assessed using 2006 performance (which was based on different criteria). She was told that her post was being abolished and she was moved to an adviser role in another department. But shortly after she transferred, that post was also abolished and her employment ended.
The ECJ decided that, while there is nothing to prevent the dismissal of a worker who has taken parental leave, provided the dismissal is not because of taking leave, there were two potential problems in this case…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The claimant in Jobcentre Plus v Jamil worked in a job centre some 80 minutes’ travel time from home.
China’s new Trademark Law will come into effect on 1 May 2014. To implement the new law, new regulations have been drafted.
Analysis from The Lawyer
When a firm shouts loudly about a landmark merger, as SJ Berwin did when it joined forces with King & Wood Mallesons, departures are always likely to come under the spotlight.
The Lawyer’s latest Top 50 litigation firms list shows that business for dispute specialists is roaring along while new in-depth detail reveals the winning strategies