Out-of-hours conduct — when is it a workplace issue?
By Rick Catanzariti and Carly Traeger
The line between conduct that may be said to have taken place within or outside the workplace is often quite blurry. While the conduct of an employee in any part of their life has the potential to affect the reputation of their employer, at what point does their out-of-hours conduct constitute a workplace issue?
A valid reason for dismissal as a consequence of an employee’s misconduct may exist if there is a connection between the out-of-hours misconduct and the employment. In the seminal case of Rose v Telstra, it was held that such a connection will arise when the employee’s misconduct is so serious it indicates that the employment contract simply cannot continue.
On the other hand, employers may also be vicariously liable for the out-of-hours misconduct of their employees in circumstances where complaints are made under anti-discrimination law…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
Why register to The Lawyer
More relevant to you
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
The Australian Taxation Office released a draft ruling on the Goods and Services Tax treatment of bitcoin transactions on 20 August 2014.
DLA Piper’s ‘Life sciences: patent extension strategies and antitrust global update’ video covers global antitrust and competition issues including product hopping and reverse payment patents.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Regulators are ramping up the pressure in the aftermath of recession, leaving firms to compete for compliance and restructuring work
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.