Oops, boop-oop-a-doop — unauthorised merchandising found not to be mere embellishment
The High Court recently handed down its judgment in the case of Hearst Holding Inc & Anor v Avela Inc and Ors  EWHC 439 (Ch) regarding the use by the defendants of an image of Betty Boop and the word ‘Boop’ on merchandise. The defendants were held liable for trademark infringement and passing off both in respect of the use of infringing imagery on merchandise and also in the offering of merchandise licences. The decision of Mr Justice Birss fires a warning shot to licensors and distributors who believe that their use of images and words on merchandising is mere embellishment.
Hearst is the registered proprietor of a number of UK and CTM registered word marks for BETTY BOOP together with device marks featuring the character Betty Boop with or without an accompanying word mark in a selection of classes. The claimants claimed to be the successors of the originator of the cartoon character Betty Boop and the only legitimate source of Betty Boop merchandise in the UK. Avela licensed artwork, including images of Betty Boop and the word ‘Betty’ or ‘Boop’ for use on clothing merchandise. Avela’s co-defendants comprised its UK licensing agent (TPTL), UK licensees, distributors and merchandise retailers.
Hearst brought proceedings against Avela and others for trademark infringement (under section 10 of the Trade Marks Act 1994 for the word marks and 10 and 10 of the act for all of the claimants’ trademarks). In addition, Hearst claimed two cases of passing off: the sale of Betty Boop merchandise misrepresented as official merchandise to trade and the public; and the deception to Avela’s licensees that they had been granted a licence by the claimants or a party authorised by the claimants…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Macfarlanes briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Macfarlanes
M&A Weekly Update: forced sale of shares does not qualify as ‘an offer to the public’ requiring publication of prospectus; and more
Macfarlanes has released its M&A Weekly Update for the period 27 June to 3 July 2014.
Investment Management Update — 4 July 2014: FCA Handbook Notice 13; ESMA updates Q&As on AIFMD; and more
Macfarlanes has released the 4 July 2014 issue of its Investment Management Update.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As the equity capital markets rocketed back into favour and global M&A saw at least a partial return to form, there have been some rich pickings for The Lawyer’s Corporate Team of the Year award shortlisted firms in 2014.
Footie and telecoms dominate our regular round-up of recent M&A activity, as the threat of rising interest rates kick-started activity among organisations.