Online copyright infringement: the Court of Justice rules on jurisdiction
On 3 October 2013, the Court of Justice of the European Union, in case C-170/12, decided on the interpretation of article 5(3) of Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 on jurisdiction in civil and commercial matters.
According to such rule, as an exception from the rule of general jurisdiction based on the defendant’s domicile, ‘a person domiciled in a member state may, in another member state, be sued: […] in matters relating to tort, delict or quasi-delict, in the courts for the place where the harmful event occurred or may occur’.
In particular, the Court of Justice ruled on whether, pursuant to such rule of special jurisdiction, the author of a copyrighted work may bring a claim for damages before the court for the place where he is domiciled, because of the online sale of a pirated CD through a website accessible in the country of his domicile…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the NCTM briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from NCTM
Briefings from NCTM
One of the EPO Boards of Appeal has ruled on the highly debated issue of human stem cell patentability under the European Patent Convention.
On 7 February 2014, the European Court of Justice (Case 98-13) issued a ruling pertaining to the interpretation of Council Regulation (EC) no. 1383/2003.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Being sent to London on secondment is a prized opportunity for associates in European firms