One size doesn’t fit all: right to return to suitable post is not just a question of job title
An employee returning to work after additional maternity leave has the right to return to the job in which she was employed before her absence or, if it is not reasonably practicable for the employer to allow her to return to that job, to another job that is ‘both suitable for her and appropriate for her in the circumstances’. The purpose of the right is to allow the returnee to come back to a work situation as near as possible to the one she left.
The claimant in Kelly v Secretary of State for Justice had been employed at a prison. She came back from maternity leave to find that the job she had previously carried out, detailed in her job description as a ‘Healthcare Officer (Prison Mental Health Lead — Prison)’, was no longer available, because the health services aspect had been outsourced to the NHS. The only post available to her was a job as an ‘ordinary’ prison officer. She complained that this was a breach of her right to return.
The employee’s job description made it clear that she was employed as a mental health nurse. There was a short passage at the end referring to ‘prison officer duties as directed’, including ‘control prisoner movement’, but it was accepted that only five per cent of her duties during more than 15 years’ work at the prison had been as a regular prison officer…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Hogan Lovells
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
Those who have had any involvement with Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) litigation in the last year will be unsurprised to learn that TCPA lawsuits are on the rise.
The UK government supports the European Commission’s decision not to impose mandatory quotas; it favours a self-regulatory national level approach.
Analysis from The Lawyer
When a firm shouts loudly about a landmark merger, as SJ Berwin did when it joined forces with King & Wood Mallesons, departures are always likely to come under the spotlight.
The Lawyer’s latest Top 50 litigation firms list shows that business for dispute specialists is roaring along while new in-depth detail reveals the winning strategies