'Off-the-clock' security checks and the Fair Labor Standards Act — what companies need to know
The practice of conducting unpaid security checks of employees at their workplaces is under fire across the country. Many employers have been hit with class action suits seeking to test the legitimacy of this practice under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), as well as under various state laws.
The FLSA does not require an employer to compensate its employees for ‘preliminary’ or ‘postliminary’ activities. An exception occurs, however, when these activities are ‘integral and indispensable’ to the employees’ principal work activities. The judicial determination of what is ‘integral and indispensable’ is, however, fact intensive.
Comparisons to ‘donning and doffing’ cases are inevitable but not determinative. For instance, with respect to the doffing and donning of protective gear, decisions often turn on whether such gear is required by the law, the employer or the nature of the work. In contrast, courts have been hesitant to find time engaged in security checks compensable even if required by the law (e.g. airports) but appear more willing to do so where the sole purpose of the security checks is to prevent the theft of retail merchandise…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
Health Alert — Julia Clare v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority; Dr Reid v Medical Council of NSW; and more
DLA Piper has released the 22 December 2014 issue of its Health Alert, which focuses on judgments, legislation and reports in the health sector.
The European Court of Justice (CJEU) has handed down a landmark judgment concerning the patentability of stem cells in Europe.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Regulators are ramping up the pressure in the aftermath of recession, leaving firms to compete for compliance and restructuring work
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.