Noteholder not disenfranchised from voting on a restructuring

The issue was whether certain commercial-mortgage-backed notes were disenfranchised from voting, pursuant to the interpretation of two trust deeds.

The relevant trust deeds stated, in essence, that a ‘Seller’ was disenfranchised for certain voting purposes. The question arose as to whether Barclays, which was one of the Banks defined as a ‘Seller’, was so disenfranchised when it held notes but not in the capacity as Seller.

Practically, Barclays had never (and indeed would not) held the notes as a ‘Seller’. It argued this point to the conclusion that the capacity in which the notes were held was irrelevant…

If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.

Briefings from Taylor Wessing

View more briefings from Taylor Wessing

Analysis from The Lawyer

  • singapore orchid

    Singapore: Cash course

    The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world

  • Money 317

    Crunch boom

    Financial disputes are starting to dominate the English courts as the long-awaited fallout from the downturn finally comes to town

View more analysis from The Lawyer


5 New Street Square

Turnover (£m): 228.00
No. of Lawyers: 860
No. of Lawyers (Asia Pacific): 79
Offices (Asia Pacific): 3