No winding-up order where genuine dispute over debt
A winding-up order was wrongly made where a creditor was described as a contingent creditor, but the underlying debt upon that the petition was based appeared to be genuinely disputed.
In LSI 2013 Ltd v Solar Panel Co (UK) Ltd, the petition was based upon invoices giving rise to a substantial outstanding balance on the trading account between the parties. The debtor alleged it was not liable on two of the invoices at all as they related to a different company; that there were discrepancies between the amounts shown in the invoices and those shown in the petition; that payments made were understated; and that in fact there was a balance due to it on the account, not to the petitioner. It also alleged a cross-claim…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
Employers with recognised trade unions are seeing more pressure coming their way in relation, on the one hand, to job security and on the other to improved terms and conditions.
This article considers some of the perceived advantages of arbitration and the difficulties at the enforcement stage and looks at the main arbitral institutions in the UAE.