No special treatment for landlords in review of pre-packs, but ‘clean-up’ recommended
By Nick Lloyd and Glen Flannery
On 16 June 2014, the UK government published the findings and recommendations of an independent review into pre-pack administrations, carried out by Teresa Graham CBE. Graham was deputy chair of the government’s Better Regulation Commission (BRC). She is also immediate past chair of the Regulatory Board of the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors.
Instead of an outright ban on pre-packs, which had been sought by some opponents of the technique, Graham wants to see a ‘clean-up’ involving ‘major improvements on how [pre-packs] are administered’.
She has proposed that this be achieved through a package of six voluntary measures, two of which focus on pre-pack sales to connected party purchasers, which account for almost two thirds of pre-packs…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Nabarro briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Analysis from The Lawyer
Nabarro senior partner and self-confessed “IT geek” Graham Stedman is heralding a major set of investments in technology ahead of the firm’s move to 125 London Wall this year.
Clients are more willing to bring claims against professional service providers but the risk to defendants is not as dramatic as it might seem