No pain, no gain: the benefit and burden principle
There is a general rule in property law that successors in title will not be bound by the burden of a positive covenant — such as a positive payment obligation. Of course, as with most rules in life, there are exceptions — the exception of note in this case being the equitable mutual benefit and burden principle.
The principle was first established in 1957 in a case that concerned a positive covenant to pay towards the cost of maintaining a private road. The High Court held that while a positive covenant (to pay) did not generally bind successors, the obligation could be enforced against successors who were enjoying the benefit of any associated rights; i.e. if they were using the road, they had to pay to maintain it…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Mills & Reeve briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Analysis from The Lawyer
The trend for unbundling legal work is advancing through the law firm ranks but there is still resistance in some quarters - namely in-house. We asked why