No more Mr Nice Guy — fail to adhere to court orders, rules and practice directions at your peril
When the Civil Procedure Rules (CPR) were amended last year, the revised overriding objective made it clear that the rules were in place to enable the court to deal with cases justly and at proportionate cost.
This objective was mirrored in the revised CPR 3.9 — the rule that governs the application a party may need to make if there has been a failure to comply with any rule, practice direction or court order. The revised CPR 3.9 requires the court to consider all of the circumstances of the case, including the need for ‘litigation to be conducted efficiently and at proportionate cost’; however, it also makes it clear the rules are in place ‘to enforce compliance with rules practice directions and orders’.
A number of recent court decisions have clearly shown that overturning a sanction imposed by the court will be far more difficult than it may have been pre-April 2013. The message is that failures to comply with court orders, rules or practice directions will be dealt with harshly, particularly where a sanction has been imposed…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
Do employers, especially those employing professionals and people in positions of trust, need to do more due diligence than they might have previously carried out?
Firms carrying on consumer-credit-related regulated activity need to ensure they are complying with the requirements set out in the Consumer Credit Sourcebook (CONC).