No more bi-lateral investment treaties for Indonesia
The government of Indonesia has recently (i) informed the Netherlands that its bi-lateral investment treaty with Indonesia, for the promotion and protection of investment, will be terminated from July 2015 and (ii) indicated that it will, at the earliest possible opportunity, terminate all of its 62 investment treaties with other countries including Australia, China, France, Germany, India, Singapore, South Korea and the UK.
The investment treaties guarantee (i) basic rights for foreign investors in Indonesia and (ii) basic rights for Indonesian investors in foreign countries.
There are significant variations in the wording as between different investment treaties and that wording has changed over time. However, the investor treaties generally guarantee basic investor rights of (i) fair and equitable treatment, (ii) adequate physical security and protection, (iii) most favoured nation status, (iv) no expropriation or nationalisation without market value compensation, (v) free repatriation of capital and profits and (vi) the arbitration of disputes in Washington DC…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Stephenson Harwood briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Stephenson Harwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Stephenson Harwood
This helpful one-page summary diagram shows the current expected timetable for Great Britain’s passenger rail franchises and concessions.
In Kays Hotels v Barclays Bank, the Commercial Court refused a strike-out application that was based on a bank’s argument that the claim was time-barred.
Analysis from The Lawyer
‘Exotic’ investors and opportunities for legal work beyond M&A feature in The Lawyer’s high-level roundtable debate on south-east Europe