No day at the zoo: Zoosport vs Zoot Sports

The EU General Court has upheld the decision of an OHIM Board of Appeal that there was a likelihood of confusion between the figurative mark ZOOSPORT and the earlier figurative mark ‘Zoot (or Zooz) sports’.

Despite the applicant’s submissions, the General Court agreed with the Board of Appeal that the level of attention of the relevant consumer (here, the general public) would be average and would not increase in accordance with price of the goods and services.

When comparing the signs, the court stated that, visually, the first three letters at the beginning of the earlier figurative mark are the same as the ‘zoo’ element, which is at the beginning of the mark applied for. Despite the fact that the symmetrical logo element that characterised the earlier figurative mark was not found in the applicant’s mark, this was not sufficient to depart from the Board of Appeal’s decision that the signs at issue have an average degree of visual similarity…

If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Taylor Wessing briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.

Briefings from Taylor Wessing

View more briefings from Taylor Wessing

Analysis from The Lawyer

  • merger deal

    Corporate crunch time: who will triumph at The Lawyer Awards 2014?

    As the equity capital markets rocketed back into favour and global M&A saw at least a partial return to form, there have been some rich pickings for The Lawyer’s Corporate Team of the Year award shortlisted firms in 2014. 

  • singapore orchid

    Singapore: Cash course

    The city-state is working hard to become a global wealth management hub, and law firms are gearing up for a prosperous new world

View more analysis from The Lawyer


5 New Street Square

Turnover (£m): 228.00
No. of lawyers: 860
Jurisdiction: UK
No. of offices: 4
No. of qualified lawyers: 67 (International 50)