No age discrimination by Channel 4 in John McCririck claim
By Karen Fletcher
Following an employment tribunal’s recent decision that John McCririck did not suffer age discrimination when he was replaced as a TV racing pundit, what steps can employers take to guard against similar claims?
John McCririck’s age discrimination case against Channel 4 and IMG Media (the production company behind the Channel 4 racing programmes) has been well documented in the press. Many thought that he would succeed, particularly in light of Miriam O’Reilly’s successful age discrimination claim in 2011 following her removal from Countryfile on BBC1, as the facts of this case seemed similar.
However, on 13 November 2013 a tribunal ruled that 72-year-old Mr McCririck’s direct age discrimination claim failed. This article looks at the reasons for the difference in the decisions and the steps employers can take to help protect themselves against similar claims…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
Changes have the potential to affect how developments moderate their impact through the use of Section 106 obligations.
This is the last of three articles discussing changes in the law applying to the termination of assured shorthold tenancies (ASTs).
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…