No age discrimination by Channel 4 in John McCririck claim
By Karen Fletcher
Following an employment tribunal’s recent decision that John McCririck did not suffer age discrimination when he was replaced as a TV racing pundit, what steps can employers take to guard against similar claims?
John McCririck’s age discrimination case against Channel 4 and IMG Media (the production company behind the Channel 4 racing programmes) has been well documented in the press. Many thought that he would succeed, particularly in light of Miriam O’Reilly’s successful age discrimination claim in 2011 following her removal from Countryfile on BBC1, as the facts of this case seemed similar.
However, on 13 November 2013 a tribunal ruled that 72-year-old Mr McCririck’s direct age discrimination claim failed. This article looks at the reasons for the difference in the decisions and the steps employers can take to help protect themselves against similar claims…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
Execution of an agreement is the final stage in an often lengthy process of detailed drafting and negotiation. Getting it wrong may result in invalidity and unenforceability.
Finding solutions to flooding is a matter of high importance for the government, driving changes in the law relating to foul and surface water drainage.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…