New State Secrets Implementing Regulations: more of a damp fizzle than a bang?
The People’s Republic of China State Secrets Protection Law Implementing Regulations (the ‘New State Secrets Implementing Regulations’) were promulgated on 17 January 2014 and became effective on 1 March 2014. The People’s Republic of China State Secrets Protection Law Implementing Measures — ratified by the State Council on 25 April 1990 (the ‘Old Implementing Measures’) and later published by the State Secrets Bureau (SSB) on 25 May 1990 — were simultaneously repealed with effect from 1 March 2014.
The most significant change brought about by the New State Secrets Regulations, as compared with the Old Implementing Measures, is the removal of the ‘type of harm’ definition in state secrets. Article 4 of the Old Implementing Measures had provided that any matter that if disclosed could result in specified types of harm should be considered as falling within the scope of state secrets…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump