New rules provide a framework for Shanghai free-trade zone to open the doors on VATS: a cause for optimism?
Since the establishment of the Shanghai free-trade zone (FTZ), investors have been closely monitoring the liberalisation policies in the telecommunications sector. Historically, given the highly sensitive nature of the telecommunications sector, foreign participation has been very limited in this highly regulated industry. In the People’s Republic of China, telecommunication services are divided for regulatory purposes into basic telecommunication services (BTS) and value-added telecommunication services (VATS). The provision of either BTS or VATS in China requires the service provider to obtain a BTS operating permit or a VATS operating permit respectively, each of which is issued by the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (MIIT) at the central level or by its local branches. MIIT is the main regulator of the telecommunications and internet industries in China. The types of telecommunication services falling under BTS and VATS are listed in the Circular of the Ministry of Information Industry on the Readjustment of the Classification Catalogue of Telecommunication Services (‘Telecoms Catalogue’) issued by the predecessor of the MIIT, the Ministry of Information Industry (MII). The most recent version of the Telecoms Catalogue was issued on 1 April 2003 (‘2003 Telecoms Catalogue’). MIIT has issued a draft version of the 2013 Telecoms Catalogue, but the final version has not been issued as of the date of this note.
Under existing telecommunications laws and regulations, in order to apply for a VATS permit, a foreign investor must establish a foreign invested telecoms enterprise (FITE) in the form of a Sinoforeign equity joint venture (EJV) with a Chinese partner in which the foreign shareholding is capped at 50 per cent (the foreign shareholder is capped at 49 per cent in applications for a FITE holding a BTS permit). Notwithstanding the letter of the law, MIIT and MII have historically taken a very protectionist stance in opening up the telecommunications industry to foreign investment. Since China became a member of the World Trade Organisation (WTO), it appears that only 201 or so FITEs have been formed, all in the VATS area. The reluctance of MIIT to open up the telecommunications sector to foreign investors accounts at least in part for the large number of variable interest entity structures that have been adopted in this area…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump