New custody compliance tasks for California registered advisers effective 1 April
By Ildiko Duckor and Jay B Gould
The California commissioner of business oversight recently amended California’s custody rule 10 CCR section 260.237. The new custody rule will be effective on 1 April 2014.
All investment advisers licensed or required to be licensed in California must comply with the new custody rule. California-exempt reporting advisers are not affected.
‘Having custody’ refers to holding or having authority to obtain possession of client funds or securities, for example: possession of client funds or securities unless received inadvertently and returned to the sender promptly; any arrangement (such as a general power of attorney) that authorises you to withdraw client funds or securities maintained with a custodian by instructing the custodian; any capacity with authority to access client funds or securities (such as general partner of a limited partnership, managing member of a limited liability company or trustee of a trust)…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Pillsbury briefing.
News from Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman
Aurora Energy decision deems discharges prohibited, leaves open question of permit shield applicability
On 3 September 2014, the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit issued its opinion in Alaska Community Action on Toxics v Aurora Energy Services LLC.
Scaling back considerably from the October 2012 term, the US Supreme Court issued only a few rulings affecting environmental law during the October 2013 term.