Net contribution clause under scrutiny
If more than one party is liable for the same damage, the common law assumes that they are jointly and severally liable for any loss. This means that any one of those parties can be sued for the whole of the loss.
The Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978 offers a right of recourse for parties by allowing a fair and equitable contribution to be recovered from the other party, in proportion to the amount of damage that party is actually liable for. In the construction industry, the net contribution clause is the weapon of choice, limiting the professional’s liability to a ‘fair share’ of losses suffered. However, a recent case demonstrates that although historically a vital risk management tool, these clauses are coming under the spotlight…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.