Negotiating contracts: why ‘subject to contract’ matters
By Chris Smith
The importance of creating clarity of intentions during the negotiation process of any contract has been reiterated in a recent decision by the High Court.
The regulation of negotiating contracts has long centred on the concept of the parties’ intentions and whether one or both are intent on creating a legal relationship. It is important for each party to establish and set out whether the suggested terms of a contract are capable of being accepted or whether they are merely the first step in the negotiation process.
The recent decision in Newbury v Sun Microsystems  EWHC 2180 (Newbury case) not only ruled on the intention of the parties generally, but the specific wording that was used in correspondence when the parties were negotiating the terms of the contract…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Goodman Derrick briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Goodman Derrick
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Goodman Derrick
The introduction of compulsory pre-tribunal claim conciliation and forthcoming changes to the transfer of undertakings regulation
This year saw a raft of changes to employment law being introduced by the coalition government and 2014 will be no different.
In Société des Produits Nestlé SA v Cadbury UK Ltd, the Court of Appeal gave careful consideration to the application of Article 2 of the Trade Marks Directive 2008/95/EC.
Analysis from The Lawyer
You don’t have to be a big firm to innovate and thrive in a downturn, as our look at the lower half of the UK 200 shows. We pick 10 inspiring stories
Our latest in-depth analysis of UK M&A legal bills reveals a good performance by smaller firms and success fees on the rise