Negotiating contracts: why ‘subject to contract’ matters
By Chris Smith
The importance of creating clarity of intentions during the negotiation process of any contract has been reiterated in a recent decision by the High Court.
The regulation of negotiating contracts has long centred on the concept of the parties’ intentions and whether one or both are intent on creating a legal relationship. It is important for each party to establish and set out whether the suggested terms of a contract are capable of being accepted or whether they are merely the first step in the negotiation process.
The recent decision in Newbury v Sun Microsystems  EWHC 2180 (Newbury case) not only ruled on the intention of the parties generally, but the specific wording that was used in correspondence when the parties were negotiating the terms of the contract…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Goodman Derrick briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Goodman Derrick
Briefings from Goodman Derrick
Are post-termination restrictions on a recruitment consultant enforceable where information is widely available on social media?
The High Court has held that six-month non-dealing and non-solicitation post-termination restrictions were enforceable by the recruitment business against a former employee.
No, according to the EAT, in the case of a group of agency workers who were assigned to one hirer for periods ranging from between six and 25 years.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Active financial management is vital, but with firms looking more closely at the process of debt and fee collection, the personal touch still counts
The lure of the law can kick in at any stage of life. We speak to four individuals who have made a radical switch to a legal career