Need to Know HR update now available from Winckworth Sherwood
The latest edition of Need to Know HR Update from Winckworth Sherwood discusses discrimination awards and multiple respondents. It is common in discrimination cases for employees (claimants) to bring claims against more than one party (respondents). For example, in the case of the employee’s colleague who carries out the discriminatory acts and the employer who is vicariously liable for those discriminatory acts; both can be named as separate respondents.
A key question for both claimants and respondents is how liability is or can be apportioned between the respondents where compensation is awarded by a Tribunal for discrimination.
In the recent case of London Borough of Hackney v Sivanandan the Court of Appeal held that Tribunals do not have the power to apportion liability for discrimination awards where the damage caused by the respondents (e.g. the employer and the claimant’s colleague) is indivisible…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Winckworth Sherwood briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Winckworth Sherwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Winckworth Sherwood
The EAT considered whether an employee who said she was too ill to resign for 18 months and who received 39 weeks’ sick pay during that period had affirmed her contract.
It is possible for employers to defend unfair dismissal claims arising from inappropriate use of social media even if the misconduct is not work-related.