Morrisons not vicariously liable for employee who attacked customer
In Mohamud v W M Morrison Supermarkets plc , the Court of Appeal confirmed the principle that an employer will not always be vicariously liable for the actions of its employees.
Mr Mohamud, who is of Somali descent, was a customer at one of Morrisons’ petrol stations — on entering the kiosk, he asked a Morrison’s employee, Mr Khan, if he could print off some documents that were stored on a USB stick that he had with him. Mr Khan was subsequently abusive and racist towards Mr Mohamud, who then left the kiosk. Despite his supervisor instructing him not to follow Mr Mohamud, Mr Khan did so anyway and continued to subject Mr Mohamud to an unprovoked and serious assault, both kicking and punching him…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Kemp Little briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.