More comfort for public authorities on resource allocation decisions
LB Islington is the latest in the line of cases challenging cuts to services as a result of the straitened circumstances in which public bodies now find themselves. Here, Wragge & Co outlines the background to the case and the court’s decision and provides a comment on its impact for public bodies.
In July 2013, the second defendant London Fire Commissioner put forward a plan with the following principal effects: (1) the closure of 10 London fire stations; (2) the decommissioning of 14 fire appliances; and (3) the reduction by 552 in the number of firefighters in London.
The need for substantial cuts in London fire services’ expenditure during financial years 2012–13 and 2013–14 led to the plan’s development. Fire services throughout the country have faced similar challenges due to reduced support from central government. This was the first occasion when cuts to front-line services in London had to be considered…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge & Co briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
Also: forms of protection; enforcement of rights; and more.
Judgment highlights difficulties for companies in developing food products with benefits.