Money back — guaranteed: part two — no implied term in tenant break option
The Court of Appeal has overturned a decision of the High Court that implied a term into a lease by which a tenant could recoup ‘overpaid’ sums after exercising its break option.
The High Court’s original decision did not entitle tenants to apportion payments due before the break date. However, the introduction of the implied term created a degree of uncertainty for landlords and tenants. Was this a term to be implied into all leases or just that lease?
The Court of Appeal’s decision reinforces best practice: (1) if parties want to be able to claim back ‘overpaid sums’, then they should ensure the lease includes apportionment or recoup provisions that entitle them to do so; (2) parties exercising break options should follow the terms of the break option to the letter; and (3) if you are in any doubt as to what is required to exercise a break option and/or your rights after the break date, seek specialist legal advice…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
DLA Piper’s May/June 2014 edition of its Tax Newsletter provides a review of People’s Republic of China and Hong Kong tax developments.
Health Alert — Ladhams v Medical Board of Australia; Chaudhry v Medical Board of Australia; and more
DLA Piper has released the 21 July 2014 issue of its Health Alert, which focuses on judgments, legislation and reports in the health sector.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.
A new breed of lawyer is smoothing the path for companies entering emerging or unstable jurisdictions