Money back — guaranteed: part two — no implied term in tenant break option

The Court of Appeal has overturned a decision of the High Court that implied a term into a lease by which a tenant could recoup ‘overpaid’ sums after exercising its break option.

The High Court’s original decision did not entitle tenants to apportion payments due before the break date. However, the introduction of the implied term created a degree of uncertainty for landlords and tenants. Was this a term to be implied into all leases or just that lease?

The Court of Appeal’s decision reinforces best practice: (1) if parties want to be able to claim back ‘overpaid sums’, then they should ensure the lease includes apportionment or recoup provisions that entitle them to do so; (2) parties exercising break options should follow the terms of the break option to the letter; and (3) if you are in any doubt as to what is required to exercise a break option and/or your rights after the break date, seek specialist legal advice…

Click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing.

Briefings from DLA Piper

View more briefings from DLA Piper

Analysis from The Lawyer

View more analysis from The Lawyer

Overview

3 Noble Street
London
EC2V 7EE
UK
http://www.dlapiper.com

Turnover (£m): 1,539.00
No. of lawyers: 4,374(UK 200)
Jurisdiction: Global
No. of offices: Over 75
No. of qualified lawyers: 625 (International 50)

Jobs