Misuse of private information is a tort distinct from breach of confidence
Tugendhat J’s judgment contains a novel analysis of, inter alia, the nature of a ‘misuse of private information’ claim, for the first time considering, and answering in the affirmative, the question whether such a claim is a tort in its own right.
Distinguishing such a claim from a ‘breach of confidence’ has implications both in terms of gateways for service out of the jurisdiction and damages issues. The case also considered issues such as the extent to which additional grounds for service out of the jurisdiction can be added after the initial application before a master and the type of damage covered by the Data Protection Act 1998…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Allen & Overy briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
At the time of its launch Accutrainee was described as a revolutionary change to the training model. Has it proved to be so? Not really.