Mistakes happen: Court of Appeal rules that post-termination victimisation is unlawful
Ever since the Equality Act came in, there has been uncertainty as to whether it covers post-employment victimisation. This is because section 108, which clearly prohibits post-employment discrimination and harassment, specifically excludes victimisation from its scope; the victimisation provisions only extend to discrimination before or during employment.
The claimant in Jessemey v Rowstock Ltd had brought age discrimination and unfair dismissal claims against his employer following his dismissal. Shortly afterwards, his employer provided an unfavourable reference to an employment agency…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Hogan Lovells briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
Why register to The Lawyer
More relevant to you
News from Hogan Lovells
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Hogan Lovells
The decision of the US Court of Appeals has raised questions about how issuers should present their disclosures on conflict minerals under Exchange Act Rule 13p-1 and Form SD.
An interesting judgment was delivered by the Honourable J Majiki on 19 November 2013 in the Eastern Cape High Court, Port Elizabeth.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As international firms question their future in these small, closely linked markets, local lawyers too are eyeing the business environment with caution
Beyond the headline infrastructure projects, UK construction work is still recovering from the clobbering it took during the slump