Misfeasance claims against directors of companies in liquidation
By Nicholas Gordon
This article summarises the key points made by Popplewell J, in the recent case of Madoff Securities International Ltd (in liquidation) v Raven and Others (2013) in relation to statutory and common law defences to misfeasance claims against directors. His judgment provided a concise review of the law and also resolved an issue regarding actionable loss.
In many misfeasance/breach-of-duty cases against directors/former directors of a company now in liquidation, the facts evidence that breach or breaches are relatively clear cut and uncontroversial. This draws into focus the question of whether the director has any common law or statutory defence available to a claim against him/her for restitution to the company. This is important to officer holders and directors alike as it has an impact upon the prospects of successfully pursuing/defending a claim and any settlement negotiations…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mills & Reeve briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Mills & Reeve
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mills & Reeve
Animal welfare: recent EU conference — mid-term review of the strategy for the welfare of animals 2012–15
The conference on the achievements of the EU strategy for the welfare of animals 2012–15: mid-term review took place on 12 February 2014.
In a decision in January, the Information Commissioner’s Office found that the Financial Conduct Authority had breached the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The trend for unbundling legal work is advancing through the law firm ranks but there is still resistance in some quarters - namely in-house. We asked why