Minter Ellison submission to the Financial System Inquiry
Minter Ellison supports regular reviews of Australia’s financial system. The Wallis inquiry, the Henry review and the Johnson report each provided the context for discussion and constructive change aimed at reshaping the financial services sector for the benefit of Australians while factoring in the interests of the global investment community.
We therefore welcomes the Financial System Inquiry (FSI) and the opportunity to offer detailed insights and recommendations to the inquiry via this written submission.
While we agree with the key themes of the FSI identified by the chairman — funding the Australian economy, ensuring the financial system has the right balance between competition, stability and efficiency and addressing the impact of and facilitating the opportunities arising from technology — we submit there are a number of other fundamental themes and key legal and regulatory issues that the inquiry should consider…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Minter Ellison briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Minter Ellison
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Minter Ellison
The federal government has confirmed there will be ‘single-sided’ reporting for Phase 3B entities.
There were a number of court decisions in Hong Kong this year that continue to demonstrate the court’s non-interventionist pro-arbitration approach.