MHA or MCA — a more flexible approach?
Following the judgment in Re A v SLAM, readers should consider the process they follow for deciding whether to admit or discharge patients who lack capacity.
Mr Justice Charles handed down this judgment as president of the Upper Tribunal Administrative Appeals Chamber on 6 August 2013. We have saved our briefing note on this for your return from summer holidays — hopefully refreshed. It is of significance to any ‘decision maker’ considering whether or not to admit or discharge a patient under the Mental Health Act who may lack capacity.
It also fundamentally changes the previous position (set out by the same judge in GJ v A Foundation Trust) that, where there was a choice between the Mental Capacity Act and the Mental Health Act, the Mental Health Act had primacy…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the Mills & Reeve briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Mills & Reeve
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mills & Reeve
There is a widespread belief in the concept of ‘common law marriage’, which couples think will protect them when they buy property together. This is incorrect.
Mills & Reeve offers top tips for those looking to move or get their foot on the housing ladder.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The trend for unbundling legal work is advancing through the law firm ranks but there is still resistance in some quarters - namely in-house. We asked why