Marshalling — a remedy for the 21st century?

By Charlotte Drake

Marshalling cases are rare these days. Therefore, it is notable that two separate cases were heard in the appeal courts in 2013: Szepietowski v The National Crime Agency (formerly the Serious Organised Crime Agency) and Highbury Pension Fund Management Company and another v Zirfin Investments Management Ltd and others. This article explains why marshalling might affect a secured creditor’s position and the significance of these recent cases.

Marshalling is an equitable principle that aims to prevent one secured creditor arbitrarily depriving another secured creditor of his only security. Traditionally, it applies where the same debtor owes debts to two secured creditors.

It is easiest to show how marshalling works with an example…

Click on the link below to read the rest of the Dentons briefing.

Sign in or Register to continue reading this article

Sign in


It's quick, easy and free!

It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.

Register now

Why register to The Lawyer


Industry insight

In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.


Market intelligence

Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.


Email newsletters

Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.

More relevant to you

To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.

Analysis from The Lawyer

View more analysis from The Lawyer


1 Fleet Place

Qualified lawyers: 51
Partners: 12
Offices: 4

(International Top 50)