Marshalling — a remedy for the 21st century?
By Charlotte Drake
Marshalling cases are rare these days. Therefore, it is notable that two separate cases were heard in the appeal courts in 2013: Szepietowski v The National Crime Agency (formerly the Serious Organised Crime Agency) and Highbury Pension Fund Management Company and another v Zirfin Investments Management Ltd and others. This article explains why marshalling might affect a secured creditor’s position and the significance of these recent cases.
Marshalling is an equitable principle that aims to prevent one secured creditor arbitrarily depriving another secured creditor of his only security. Traditionally, it applies where the same debtor owes debts to two secured creditors.
It is easiest to show how marshalling works with an example…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Dentons briefing.
News from Dentons
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Dentons
Canada’s Copyright Act contains an ’unlocatable owner’ licensing mechanism (sometimes referred to as the ‘orphan works’ mechanism).
On 17 September 2014, the CFPB issued a proposal to supervise ‘larger participants’ in the auto finance market.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The continent’s boom in natural resources and renewable energy is sparking an infrastructure drive
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.