Managing an AIF — some exclusions and exemptions
In order to be a UK alternative investment fund manager (AIFM), you need to be carrying on the regulated activity of ‘managing an alternative investment fund, or AIF’. Before managers rush to submit their VoPs, they should consider whether they are actually managing an AIF in the first place or whether they could take a few steps so that they would cease to be managing an AIF before 22 July 2014.
Managing a fund that is not an AIF is not ‘managing an AIF’. The most relevant exclusions/exemptions are described below.
Employee participation schemes are excluded from the Alternative Investment Fund Managers Directive (AIFMD). This exclusion covers schemes in which an employee invests in securities of the employer or in a company in the employee’s group (or derivatives in relation to them such as options) or other schemes (such as an employee carried interest or co-investment vehicle)…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Stephenson Harwood briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Stephenson Harwood
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Stephenson Harwood
This helpful one-page summary diagram shows the current expected timetable for Great Britain’s passenger rail franchises and concessions.
In Kays Hotels v Barclays Bank, the Commercial Court refused a strike-out application that was based on a bank’s argument that the claim was time-barred.
Analysis from The Lawyer
The Lawyer’s litigation reporter looks at the ongoing saga of the Tchenguiz litigation
‘Exotic’ investors and opportunities for legal work beyond M&A feature in The Lawyer’s high-level roundtable debate on south-east Europe