Major change to collective redundancy consultation: counting to 20
The eagerly awaited Employment Appeal Tribunal judgment in the case of USDAW and others v WW Realisation 1 Ltd (in Liquidation) and others has been published. The case was brought by trade union USDAW on behalf of employees working for Woolworths when the retail chain collapsed.
Although the tribunal found that the store had breached its collective redundancy consultation obligations and made protective awards in respect of affected employees, it excluded those who worked in stores where fewer than 20 employees were dismissed. As Woolworths subsequently went into liquidation, the protective awards made were paid by the secretary of state.
USDAW appealed arguing that protective awards should have been made in respect of all employees regardless of the size of the stores in which they worked…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Shoosmiths briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Shoosmiths
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Shoosmiths
The Court of Appeal has found in favour of a business tenant and decided that a periodic tenancy had not been created in the intervening period.
Careful drafting is usually required for restrictive covenants to be enforceable, although Prophet plc v Huggett provides the exception to the rule.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Compliance and corporate governance codes for large financial institutions will undoubtedly include provisions to regulate high pay in the future
There’s more to the ABS model than attracting the man in the street and procuring external investment. Partners at the big corporate firms, take note…