M&A Weekly Update: The Registrar of Companies v Swarbrick & Ors; FCA guidance on listing rules; and more
A recent High Court case exemplifies the difficulties in removing information filed at Companies House from the public register. In The Registrar of Companies v Swarbrick & Ors (Administrators of Gardenprime Ltd)  EWHC 1466, the registrar appealed against a court order requiring it to remove information.
Section 1076 of the Companies Act 2006 permits the registrar to replace a document that has not been properly delivered. The court, in making the initial order, found that because the disputed document contained ‘unnecessary material within the meaning of section 1074’ it had not been properly delivered and ordered its removal. In fact, the unnecessary material was information that was permitted by statute to be included but was confidential. The registrar argued that it therefore did not meet both limbs of the definition of unnecessary material defined in the act as material that ‘(a) is not necessary in order to comply with an obligation under any enactment and (b) is not specifically authorised to be delivered to the registrar’, interpreting (b) as meaning authorised by statute.
The court looked in detail at sections 1074 and 1076 (paragraphs 74 and 81). It concluded that the court order rendered the disputed material ‘unnecessary material’ and once a court order had been properly made the registrar must comply with it…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Macfarlanes briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Macfarlanes
M&A Weekly Update: forced sale of shares does not qualify as ‘an offer to the public’ requiring publication of prospectus; and more
Macfarlanes has released its M&A Weekly Update for the period 27 June to 3 July 2014.
Investment Management Update — 4 July 2014: FCA Handbook Notice 13; ESMA updates Q&As on AIFMD; and more
Macfarlanes has released the 4 July 2014 issue of its Investment Management Update.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As the equity capital markets rocketed back into favour and global M&A saw at least a partial return to form, there have been some rich pickings for The Lawyer’s Corporate Team of the Year award shortlisted firms in 2014.
Footie and telecoms dominate our regular round-up of recent M&A activity, as the threat of rising interest rates kick-started activity among organisations.