M&A weekly update: 31 January–6 February
A recent case (Personnel Hygiene Services Ltd and others v Rentokil and others), decided by the Court of Appeal, considered whether a confidentiality agreement continued to apply after the conclusion of a further related agreement that contained no express obligation of confidentiality. No mention was made in the judgment of the presence of an entire agreement clause in the second agreement.
The court, upholding the first-instance decision, found the confidentiality obligation persisted, despite the conclusion of the second agreement. The court was not persuaded by an argument that the confidential information had only been provided to enable the recipient to decide whether to enter into the second agreement and therefore the obligation should not survive the conclusion of that subsequent agreement. The court also agreed, relying on the law of confidence, that the obligation should be extended to include information provided after conclusion of the second agreement, despite the lack of a provision to that effect in the first agreement.
Impact: the case will comfort those providing information to potential competitors that genuinely confidential information will be protected. The law of confidence was particularly useful in this case as the information provider had not included any provisions preventing the recipient from soliciting the provider’s customers, the details of which were confidential. The court was not convinced by the argument that in construing an obligation of confidentiality in this way it was akin to imposing an unenforceably wide restrictive covenant on the recipient. The court was also clear that the fact that some of the customer information was publicly available (e.g. names and addresses) did not mean that the non-public part of the information lost its protection…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Macfarlanes briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Macfarlanes
M&A Weekly Update: forced sale of shares does not qualify as ‘an offer to the public’ requiring publication of prospectus; and more
Macfarlanes has released its M&A Weekly Update for the period 27 June to 3 July 2014.
Investment Management Update — 4 July 2014: FCA Handbook Notice 13; ESMA updates Q&As on AIFMD; and more
Macfarlanes has released the 4 July 2014 issue of its Investment Management Update.
Analysis from The Lawyer
As the equity capital markets rocketed back into favour and global M&A saw at least a partial return to form, there have been some rich pickings for The Lawyer’s Corporate Team of the Year award shortlisted firms in 2014.
Footie and telecoms dominate our regular round-up of recent M&A activity, as the threat of rising interest rates kick-started activity among organisations.