Loss of profit exclusion clauses — no 'get out of jail free' card
Somewhat controversially, the Court of Appeal has construed a loss of profit exclusion clause against its apparent plain English meaning so as to allow a claim. Daniel Newbound takes a look at what this means for those drafting and relying on such clauses.
The recent case of Kudos Catering (UK) Limited v Manchester Central Convention Complex Ltd concerned a situation where a party sought to rely upon an exclusion clause to exclude its liability for loss of profit in relation to a repudiatory breach of contract. In its decision, the Court of Appeal interpreted an exclusion clause against its apparent plain English wording so that it did not exclude the claimant’s loss of profit claim. This decision has interesting implications for parties seeking to rely upon exclusion clauses and for those drafting them.
Kudos is a catering company that contracted with Manchester Central Convention Complex Limited (MCCC), the owner of a large conference and exhibition centre, to provide catering services at the venue for a five-year period…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Walker Morris briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Walker Morris
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Walker Morris
Landlords must protect tenants’ deposits and provide tenants with prescribed information, regardless of when the tenancy commenced and when the deposit was received.
In the Yam Seng case, the court was willing to imply a duty of good faith to give business efficacy to a commercial contract. Since that case, the law has been somewhat uncertain.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all
The law school war shows no signs of ending. But we have, perhaps, reached the end of the beginning.