LLP members — not whistling in the dark
The UK Supreme Court has ruled in Clyde & Co v Bates van Winkelhof  UKSC 32 that members of limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are workers who can benefit from whistleblower protections. This could have far-reaching implications for LLPs and their members.
Ms Bates van Winkelhof was a partner working for Clyde and Co. After being expelled from the LLP she brought claims in relation to whistleblowing and sex discrimination.
The employment tribunal at first instance held that it had no jurisdiction to hear the whistleblowing claim, as Ms Bates van Winkelhof was not a ‘worker’. A worker is defined in s230(3) of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 96) as an individual who has entered into or works under (or, where the employment has ceased, worked under)…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Dentons briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from The Lawyer
Analysis from The Lawyer
Life in Canada is getting harder for firms as commodities prices fall and work volumes slow
Which firms are cutting it in this era of slimline rosters, and who are the GC new brooms making clean sweeps? The Lawyer can reveal all