LLP members are ‘workers’
By Yvonne Gallagher
In a long-awaited judgment, the Supreme Court has confirmed that Ms Bates van Winkelhof, a former member of Clyde & Co, is a ‘worker’ for the purposes of the Employment Rights Act and is therefore entitled to the benefit of the protection given by employment law to whistleblowers.
The term ‘worker’ is used in a number of aspects of employment legislation where protection is afforded to a group wider than just those who are employees. There was no suggestion that Ms van Winkelhof was or could have been an employee for statutory purposes.
The definition of ‘worker’ for the purposes of many statutory provisions includes an individual who works under a contract ‘whereby the individual undertakes to do or perform personally any work or services for any other party to the contract whose status is not by virtue of the contract that of a client of any profession or business undertaking carried on by the individual’…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co
Wragge Lawrence Graham & Co’s employment &and equalities experts bring you the latest developments that may affect your business – what they are, an
The Court of Appeal looked at when a public body is required to appoint new decision makers where a decision has been held to be unlawful and is remitted to the body to be retaken.