Litigation funding, champerty and the Code of 1771
It’s official. Third-party litigation funding will not infringe the laws against champerty and maintenance and will not be contrary to the Code of 1771.
Last week, the Royal Court handed down judgment in the latest hearing in the proceedings brought by Barclays Wealth Trustees (Jersey) Ltd and Barclays Wealth Fund Managers (Jersey) Ltd as trustee and manager of R2R Funds against the former trustee and manager, Equity Trust (Jersey) Ltd and Equity Trust Services Ltd.
The judgment is of particular importance as this was the first challenge to a funding arrangement and the first time that the court has heard full argument on whether funding arrangements are contrary to the Jersey law of champerty (the earlier judgment in Re The Valetta Trust being a Beddoe application). It is also the first time that it has heard any argument at all on the ambit of the provision of the Code of 1771 that says ‘personne ne pourra contracter pour choses ou matières en litige’…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mourant Ozannes briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
News from Mourant Ozannes
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Mourant Ozannes
Getting it right: how to make a successful application for the appointment of provisional liquidators
The main job of a judge is to determine and uphold rights of property ownership, so applications to appoint provisional liquidators tend to go against the judicial grain.
The States of Jersey have passed an amendment to the Employment (Jersey) Law 2003, incorporating a number of ‘family-friendly’ rights into the legislation.