Litigation funding, champerty and the Code of 1771
It’s official. Third-party litigation funding will not infringe the laws against champerty and maintenance and will not be contrary to the Code of 1771.
Last week, the Royal Court handed down judgment in the latest hearing in the proceedings brought by Barclays Wealth Trustees (Jersey) Ltd and Barclays Wealth Fund Managers (Jersey) Ltd as trustee and manager of R2R Funds against the former trustee and manager, Equity Trust (Jersey) Ltd and Equity Trust Services Ltd.
The judgment is of particular importance as this was the first challenge to a funding arrangement and the first time that the court has heard full argument on whether funding arrangements are contrary to the Jersey law of champerty (the earlier judgment in Re The Valetta Trust being a Beddoe application). It is also the first time that it has heard any argument at all on the ambit of the provision of the Code of 1771 that says ‘personne ne pourra contracter pour choses ou matières en litige’…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Mourant Ozannes briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.