Litigation and Regulatory Update: no knock-out blow in bank fees class actions (Paciocco v ANZ)
Both sides claimed victory when Justice Gordon of the Federal Court of Australia delivered her decision in the bank fees litigation, Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd  FC 35 (Paciocco v ANZ), and both sides are contemplating their respective positions in terms of an appeal. Therefore, the much anticipated clarity around the doctrine of penalties may be short lived.
Justice Gordon found that ANZ’s credit card late-payment fees are ‘penalties’ and are unenforceable. A necessary element of this finding was that Her Honour considered the late-payment fees were extravagant and unconscionable. However, it is important to note that Her Honour commented that ‘…there was no allegation of dishonesty, oppression or abuse of a commercially powerful position and none existed’.
Her Honour found that ANZ’s other fees such as dishonour fees, overdrawn and over-limit fees are not penalties and are therefore enforceable. The decision, in practical terms, is the same as Her Honour’s decision in Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2011) 211 FCR 53 (Andrews v ANZ). In that case, Her Honour found that only the late payment fees were penalties and that the other fees were not. However, her decision in the Paciocco case is informed by the High Court’s subsequent judgment in Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd  HCA 30 (Andrews HC)…
Click on the link below to read the rest of the DLA Piper briefing.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from DLA Piper
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from DLA Piper
Health Alert — Julia Clare v Australian Community Pharmacy Authority; Dr Reid v Medical Council of NSW; and more
DLA Piper has released the 22 December 2014 issue of its Health Alert, which focuses on judgments, legislation and reports in the health sector.
The European Court of Justice (CJEU) has handed down a landmark judgment concerning the patentability of stem cells in Europe.
Analysis from The Lawyer
Regulators are ramping up the pressure in the aftermath of recession, leaving firms to compete for compliance and restructuring work
Shearman & Sterling is making its presence felt in the City, squaring up to magic circle firms and looking to muscle in on key relationships. Private equity house Bridgepoint is one outfit that has had its head turned by the US firm.