Limits to appealing arbitration awards to Court of Appeal
Under the Arbitration Act 1996 (the Act), there are limited circumstances in which an arbitration award can be appealed to the High Court. If leave to appeal is granted by the High Court, but one of the parties subsequently wishes to appeal from the High Court judgment, it must apply to the High Court judge who handed down the judgment for permission to appeal to the Court of Appeal. If the judge refuses leave to appeal, the Court of Appeal does not have the jurisdiction to overrule his decision and grant leave to appeal. That is therefore the end of the line for the unsuccessful party, which must accept the High Court decision unless it can rely on the Court of Appeal’s residual jurisdiction to set aside the High Court judge’s refusal of permission.
The Court of Appeal can, however, only exercise this residual discretion if the High Court judge’s decision is considered to be so unfair or improper that it cannot be considered a decision at all. The very high threshold for demonstrating such unfairness on the part of the judge is reflected by the fact that the Court of Appeal has not to date exercised this residual discretion under the Act. In a recent charterparty dispute, it has again refused to entertain an application challenging the Commercial Court judge’s refusal of permission to appeal…
If you are registered and logged in to the site, click on the link below to read the rest of the Ince & Co briefing. If not, please register or sign in with your details below.
Sign in or Register to continue reading this article
It's quick, easy and free!
It takes just 5 minutes to register. Answer a few simple questions and once completed you’ll have instant access.Register now
Why register to The Lawyer
In-depth, expert analysis into the stories behind the headlines from our leading team of journalists.
Identify the major players and business opportunities within a particular region through our series of free, special reports.
Receive your pick of The Lawyer's daily and weekly email newsletters, tailored by practice area, region and job function.
More relevant to you
To continue providing the best analysis, insight and news across the legal market we are collecting some information about who you are, what you do and where you work to improve The Lawyer and make it more relevant to you.
News from Ince & Co
News from The Lawyer
Briefings from Ince & Co
The facts of the underlying dispute in Compania Sud Americana de Vapores A v Hin-Pro International Logistics are less interesting than the Court’s findings
December 2014 saw the first three convictions in the Sustainable Growth Group case, involving the fraudulent selling and promotion of investment products based on green biofuel.